Changes to 2025 JAMB UTME Registration Dates and Law Program Suspensions

  • Home
  • /
  • Changes to 2025 JAMB UTME Registration Dates and Law Program Suspensions
Keabetswe Monyake Feb 1 16

Shift in Registration Date for JAMB 2025 UTME

The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has announced a significant update regarding the registration process for the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME). Originally scheduled to commence on January 31, 2025, the registration will now begin on February 3, 2025. This shift, though appearing minor, carries weighty implications for potential candidates and stakeholders who had been preparing for the earlier date.

The delay in registration start was sanctioned by JAMB following careful consideration of several underlying factors. Dr. Fabian Benjamin, serving as the public communication advisor for JAMB, stated that the primary motivation for this postponement was to allow the board to make essential adjustments in its registration templates. These modifications have become imperative in light of recent developments concerning the status of certain law programs across specific universities. The changes are intended to ensure that the registration process is smoother and devoid of potential legal entanglements.

Suspension of Selected Law Programs

One of the driving forces for this update is the suspension of law programs at several universities, as informed by the Council for Legal Education. JAMB received submissions indicating that these programs no longer meet the required standards set by the council. Consequently, JAMB responded by pausing admissions into law faculties at nine different institutions for the 2025/26 academic session. This includes the law faculty at Fountain University in Osogbo. Such suspensions are not taken lightly and usually follow extensive consultations with stakeholders and thorough evaluations by legal education experts. It underscores the vigilance and prioritization of quality education standards prevailing within the board and the council.

In addition to Fountain University, eight other institutions are similarly affected. These include Kwara State University in Malete, Bingham University in Nasarawa, Redeemers University in Osun, Western Delta University in Delta, Taraba State University in Jalingo, Arthur Jarvis University in Cross River, Alex Ekwueme Federal University in Ebonyi, and the Nigerian Police Academy in Kano. The decision to suspend the law program at the Nigerian Police Academy spans two academic sessions, 2025/2026 and 2026/2027, demonstrating a staggered approach towards ensuring compliance with legal educational standards.

Scrutiny and Removal of Deceptive CBT Centers

Another critical aspect forcing the delay is the discovery that certain Computer-Based Test (CBT) centers employed deceptive means to gain approval from JAMB. An extensive audit revealed that some centers used unauthorized facilities, undermining the integrity of the JAMB registration process. To rectify this, JAMB has begun a comprehensive review, ensuring only genuinely capable centers receive accreditation. By disapproving these centers, JAMB seeks to maintain the credibility and fairness of the examination process while safeguarding students' interests.

This measure reinforces JAMB's commitment to creating a level playing field for UTME candidates. Not only does this protect students from exploitation by unscrupulous operators, but it also enhances the reliability of the UTME as an equitable path into the tertiary education system. Candidates and stakeholders are urged to stay informed about approved CBT centers and use JAMB's resources to verify the authenticity of centers.

Impact on Candidates and Stakeholders

The rescheduling of the UTME registration date, alongside the suspension of law programs, has certainly raised concerns across Nigeria's educational landscape. For many students and their families, these changes necessitate adjustments to their preparatory schedules and plans. JAMB has acknowledged the potential disruption caused and tendered apologies for any inconvenience that may have arisen.

Despite this inconvenience, the board remains determined that adequate time is crucial for implementing these important enhancements. The overarching goal is to deliver a seamless and transparent registration process while upholding the quality and approval status of academic programs offered across Nigerian universities. Students are encouraged to utilize the JAMB portal and official updates to stay informed.

Additionally, this change is expected to refine the registration process, mitigating errors and ensuring candidates are not subjected to avoidable challenges during registration. For institutions, this also serves as a reminder of the need for continuous adherence to educational criteria as stipulated by relevant authoritative bodies like the Council for Legal Education.

JAMB's Commitment to Quality and Transparency

JAMB's Commitment to Quality and Transparency

JAMB's proactive approach in addressing these issues highlights its commitment to quality assurance and transparency within the Nigerian educational system. The decision to suspend some law programs and scrutinize CBT centers is a testament to its dedication to maintaining academic standards.

This ongoing commitment underscores an unwavering focus on creating a credible admissions platform into Nigeria's tertiary institutions. By taking these steps, JAMB aims to rectify discrepancies and bolster public confidence in the admissions process. The board remains resolute in its mission to provide equitable access to quality higher education for all Nigerian students, while ensuring their processes align with global standards of fairness and excellence.

Stakeholders, including students, parents, and educational institutions, are encouraged to engage with JAMB's continuous updates and guidelines as they navigate these changes. This engagement is vital, as it fosters an informed community ready to embrace the improvements being implemented for the future benefit of Nigeria's educational landscape.

Comments (16)
  • Jo Simpkinson
    Jo Simpkinson February 1, 2025

    Oh great because shifting a three‑day deadline totally solves everything

  • Darrell Kuykendall
    Darrell Kuykendall February 7, 2025

    Hey folks, don’t let the date shift get you down! This extra weekend gives you a breather to double‑check your documents, so use it wisely. Grab a coffee, review those past papers, and keep the momentum going. Remember, every setback is a set‑up for a comeback, and JAMB is still the gateway to your dreams!!!

  • Dean Obijekwu
    Dean Obijekwu February 12, 2025

    Just a heads‑up, the new registration start on Feb 3 means the usual prep timeline shifts a bit. I’ll be sticking to my study schedule, no big changes. Best of luck to everyone staying focused.

  • finlay moss
    finlay moss February 18, 2025

    Alright, so JAMB basically hit the snooze button on the registration start, huh? I guess they realized the CBT centre audit was a nightmare and needed more time to sort the mess. Anyway, you’ll still need to check the approved centre list or you’ll end up on the wrong side of a fake exam centre. Cheers for the update!

  • Carl Gough
    Carl Gough February 24, 2025

    Yo, they’re pulling the plug on law programmes at nine universities-seriously? That’s a massive blow for anyone eyeing a legal career, especially at places like Fountain University. The Council for Legal Education must have uncovered some deep‑rooted issues, otherwise why the drama? Hope the schools sort it out fast, or students will be left in the lurch.

  • Rebecca Hayes
    Rebecca Hayes March 2, 2025

    From a compliance perspective, the suspension aligns with accreditation protocols. Institutions must meet the CLE standards to maintain programme validity. Stakeholders should monitor the remediation pathways and adjust admission strategies accordingly.

  • Jason Underhill
    Jason Underhill March 7, 2025

    Wow, another administrative shuffle-just what we needed 🙄. Guess we’ll all get extra time to stare at the portal, right?

  • Kirsten Wilson
    Kirsten Wilson March 13, 2025

    Isn’t it fascinating how a mere three‑day delay can ripple through the entire educational ecosystem? It’s like a butterfly effect, but with paperwork. The suspension of law programmes is a clear signal that quality trumps quantity. One must ponder whether this will inspire reforms elsewhere. Anyway, stay vigilant and keep scrolling for updates.

  • Michelle Roque
    Michelle Roque March 19, 2025

    Just read the article, looks like they’re trying to clean up the CBT centre mess. Hopefully it means fewer scams for future candidates.

  • Killian Lecrut
    Killian Lecrut March 24, 2025

    So JAMB decided to push the start date, huh? At least we get a few extra days to perfect our essays-sarcasm aside, this could be a blessing in disguise.

  • Subi Sambi
    Subi Sambi March 30, 2025

    The decision to suspend law programmes is a stark reminder that standards cannot be compromised. Candidates targeting those institutions must reassess their options immediately. It also underscores the importance of rigorous oversight by bodies like the Council for Legal Education. Prospective students should diversify their applications to mitigate risk. This move could ultimately elevate the overall quality of legal education in the region.

  • Joshua Rainey
    Joshua Rainey April 5, 2025

    I see JAMB trying to play the role of the omnipotent scheduler, shifting the registration window by a mere three days as if it were a casual coffee break. This so‑called “adjustment” is framed as a benevolent act, yet it masks deeper institutional frailties that have been simmering for years. The suspension of law programmes at nine universities is not a trivial footnote; it is a seismic shift that will derail countless academic trajectories. Students who have spent months preparing for the UTME now face uncertainty about whether their chosen faculty will even exist when they finally sit the exam. Moreover, the audit of deceptive CBT centres reveals a systemic vulnerability that could have compromised the integrity of the entire admissions process. One might argue that a three‑day delay provides a buffer to address these issues, but does it truly resolve the root causes? The Council for Legal Education’s involvement indicates that regulatory bodies are finally exerting pressure, yet the timing feels reactive rather than proactive. Prospective law students must now scramble to identify alternative institutions, a task that demands extensive research and perhaps additional applications. This disruption also places a heavy emotional burden on families who have allocated resources based on the original timelines. From an administrative standpoint, JAMB’s communication strategy appears opaque, relying on vague statements from a public advisor rather than transparent, actionable guidance. The lack of a detailed remediation plan for the suspended programmes further fuels speculation about the board’s capacity to enforce standards consistently. While the intention to maintain quality is commendable, the execution feels disjointed and poorly coordinated. Stakeholders, including secondary schools and coaching centres, are left in limbo, uncertain about how to advise their students. Ultimately, this episode serves as a cautionary tale about the cascading effects of bureaucratic inertia. Let’s hope the lessons learned translate into more robust processes for the next admission cycle.

  • Gail Robb
    Gail Robb April 11, 2025

    Well, that was a marathon of a rant, but you’ve nailed the key points-especially the need for genuine transparency. Still, a three‑day shift feels like a Band‑Aid on a broken bone. Maybe JAMB should focus on fixing the CBT centre issues before fiddling with dates.

  • Pradeep Chabdal
    Pradeep Chabdal April 16, 2025

    It is evident that the academic community must uphold a paradigm of excellence, lest we descend into mediocrity. The suspension serves as an epistemic catalyst, prompting introspection across institutional hierarchies. One must appreciate the nuanced interplay between regulatory oversight and curricular integrity. Accordingly, stakeholders should convene to articulate a cohesive remediation framework.

  • andy heri
    andy heri April 22, 2025

    Thanks for breaking down the implications in plain language. It helps a lot to see the big picture without getting overwhelmed. Stay positive, everyone-there’s still a path forward.

  • Jeremy Perlman
    Jeremy Perlman April 28, 2025

    Listen, the reality is that JAMB’s last‑minute changes are typical of bureaucratic inertia; they’ll keep shifting dates until the sun explodes!!! You need to constantly check the portal, verify CBT centre legitimacy, and adjust your study plan on the fly!!! It’s chaotic but that’s the game we’re playing.

Write a comment
Thanks for your comment
Error, comment failed