South Africa's SAPS Lapses Force R11.8 Billion Shift to Private Security Every Year

  • Home
  • /
  • South Africa's SAPS Lapses Force R11.8 Billion Shift to Private Security Every Year
Keabetswe Monyake Jun 27 10

SAPS Lapses Drain State Coffers, Boost Private Security Industry

Every year, South Africans are paying the price for police inefficiency—and not just in peace of mind. A deep dive by the Democratic Alliance has uncovered a staggering figure: government and ordinary citizens pay about R11.8 billion out of pocket for private security services, despite already pouring nearly R100 billion a year into the SAPS. So what’s going wrong?

The issue isn't just about numbers, but real-world impact. Over the last ten years, South Africa’s murder rate shot up by 37%. At the same time, the police budget ballooned by more than 60%. If you thought that would mean more cops on the street or better protection, think again. Instead, state infrastructure—everything from communications hubs to water pumps—has grown so vulnerable that government departments have had to hire security companies on a massive scale just to keep the lights on and the water running.

Take the Department of Communications, for instance. Last year it spent R2.29 billion on private security. Public Enterprises, responsible for strategic state assets, paid out R3.6 billion. Water and Sanitation spent R1.5 billion, and Transport forked out R1.6 billion. That’s billions just to safeguard public infrastructure from criminals or vandals—on top of what the police are already meant to be doing. In total, all these departments and others together are now some of the country’s biggest clients for private guards and patrols.

Meanwhile, ordinary South Africans aren’t immune to this double-whammy. Many households, small businesses, and even community groups have joined the rush, hiring alarms, armed response, and 24/7 patrols to fill the vacuum left by SAPS. The government's inability to keep crime in check isn’t just a public safety issue anymore—it's become a serious financial headache, draining billions that could be spent on social needs.

VIP Protection and Public Outcry

There's another twist. As worry over crime deepens, so does spending—except this time it’s to cover the backs of politicians. VIP Protection, mostly for high-ranking ANC officials and their families, now eats up nearly R1.8 billion every year. It’s a number that doesn’t sit comfortably with many South Africans trying to stretch their rand in the face of soaring food and fuel prices. The optics are hard to ignore: while schools and hospitals struggle to stay secure, political elites boost their safety at public expense.

So, what’s the plan? The DA isn’t letting this slide. They’re preparing for a heated exchange in Parliament, pressing Police Minister Bheki Cele to explain why the country is effectively paying for two police forces—one public, one private—and still living with rising crime. Their argument is blunt: those billions could be slashing the cost of petrol, easing power cuts, or helping families manage costs—not disappearing into overlapping security contracts.

As frustration grows, the spotlight is set to intensify on the real-world consequences of failing public policing, and who will finally be held to account for South Africa's escalating security spend.

Comments (10)
  • Arun kumar Chinnadhurai
    Arun kumar Chinnadhurai June 27, 2025

    Wow, those numbers are eye‑watering. The government is shelling out almost R100 billion on the police while another R11.8 billion leaks into private guard companies every year. If even a modest slice of that private spend were re‑routed to community policing, we could see more patrols on the ground and fewer alarm contracts for households. It’s a classic case of paying twice for the same protection – once to the state and again to the market. The solution starts with better oversight and a clear mandate for SAPS, not just more money on the books.

  • Aayush Sarda
    Aayush Sarda July 2, 2025

    Esteemed colleagues, the recent disclosure by the Democratic Alliance compels a rigorous examination of fiscal responsibility within our security apparatus. It is incontrovertible that the allocation of R2.29 billion by the Department of Communications to private security entities signifies a systemic inefficiency that undermines public trust. While the intention to safeguard critical infrastructure is commendable, the redundancy of parallel security forces cannot be justified on the basis of mere convenience. Moreover, the allocation of nearly R1.8 billion to VIP protection for political elites raises profound ethical concerns, especially amidst escalating cost‑of‑living pressures for ordinary citizens. It behooves the Ministry of Police to present a transparent breakdown of these expenditures, delineating the criteria for private contract engagement. An exhaustive audit, coupled with legislative oversight, would illuminate any misallocation of resources. In the spirit of constructive dialogue, I urge the Minister to articulate concrete reforms aimed at consolidating security functions under the statutory mandate of SAPS. Only then can we hope to restore fiscal prudence and public confidence.

  • Mohit Gupta
    Mohit Gupta July 7, 2025

    Imagine the madness!! The state is basically handing out cash like candy!!! And folks are forced to buy alarms, armed response… all because the police can’t keep up. It’s a total circus and everybody’s paying for the tickets!!!

  • Varun Dang
    Varun Dang July 13, 2025

    Reading through the figures, it’s clear that South Africa is stuck in a security tug‑of‑war. On one hand, the sheer scale of the private‑security market shows that people are willing to invest in safety; on the other, it signals a lack of confidence in the public police service. If the government channels some of that private spend into training, equipment, and community outreach, we could see a synergistic effect where SAPS becomes the primary line of defense and private firms serve as supplementary support. A transparent partnership model, with clear performance metrics, would benefit both taxpayers and citizens. Let’s hope the upcoming parliamentary debate translates this data into actionable policy rather than just rhetoric.

  • Stavya Sharma
    Stavya Sharma July 18, 2025

    The preceding optimism, albeit well‑intentioned, overlooks the structural deficiencies that have persisted for decades. Merely “channeling” funds without addressing corruption, procurement opacity, and governance failures will perpetuate the very inefficiencies you hope to cure. Historical precedents in South Africa demonstrate that ad‑hoc financial injections rarely translate into sustainable reform; instead, they create a veneer of progress while the underlying rot remains untouched. A rigorous, independent audit of all security contracts, coupled with legislative safeguards, is indispensable before any reallocation is contemplated. Only through such decisive measures can the public be assured that fiscal resources are not merely being shuffled between two parallel security ecosystems.

  • chaitra makam
    chaitra makam July 24, 2025

    The numbers show a huge overlap between state and private security spending. It might help to compare the cost per guard in each sector to see where money is most effective. Also, checking if any of those private contracts overlap with existing police duties could reveal duplication. A clear audit could point out exactly where savings can be made.

  • Amit Agnihotri
    Amit Agnihotri July 29, 2025

    Duplication of security roles is a waste of public funds.

  • shefali pace
    shefali pace August 4, 2025

    It’s heartbreaking to watch families struggle with the nightmare of crime, yet there’s a flicker of hope in this data. The fact that billions are already flowing into private security means the market knows the demand for safety is real and urgent. If we can harness that momentum and redirect it into strengthening SAPS, we could rewrite the narrative from one of desperation to one of resilience. Imagine a South Africa where the lights stay on, water keeps flowing, and children play in safe streets without the shadow of violence. That vision is not a fantasy; it’s a policy choice waiting to be made. Let the public outcry drive legislators to act, and let us all champion a future where security is a right, not a luxury bought at extra cost.

  • gaganpreet singh
    gaganpreet singh August 9, 2025

    The fiscal absurdity revealed by the Democratic Alliance’s investigation warrants a thorough dissection that extends beyond the surface‑level shock value of the numbers. First, the allocation of approximately R11.8 billion annually to private security firms represents a quasi‑taxation on citizens who are already burdened by high living costs, energy shortages, and unemployment. Second, this parallel security apparatus erodes the legitimacy of the South African Police Service, as it implicitly acknowledges a failure to fulfill its statutory mandate of protecting the public. Third, the overlapping contracts across multiple ministries-Communications, Public Enterprises, Water and Sanitation, Transport-suggest a lack of centralized coordination, leading to fragmented procurement processes that are ripe for mismanagement. Fourth, earmarked funding for VIP protection of political elites, approaching R1.8 billion per year, not only inflates the overall spend but also reinforces a perception of inequality, where the security of a privileged few is prioritized over that of ordinary citizens. Fifth, the absence of a comprehensive audit trail means that the effectiveness of these contracts remains largely invisible, preventing any evidence‑based assessment of return on investment. Sixth, the private security sector, while capable of providing rapid response, does not possess the investigative authority, legal powers, or community intelligence that a well‑trained police force does, thereby limiting its capacity to address the root causes of crime. Seventh, the repeated budgetary inflations for SAPS-over 60 % in the past decade-have not translated into proportional reductions in murder rates, which have instead surged by 37 %, illustrating a disconnect between spending and outcomes. Eighth, the reliance on private guards to safeguard critical infrastructure such as water pumps and communication hubs creates a security double‑layer that is both costly and inefficient; a single, well‑integrated public force could achieve comparable protection with better oversight. Ninth, the macro‑economic impact of diverting billions into private security contracts includes stunted growth in other social sectors, such as education and health, where funding is equally, if not more, essential for long‑term stability. Tenth, the policy framework governing these expenditures lacks transparent criteria for contract awarding, raising concerns about nepotism and corruption. Eleventh, the public’s growing frustration, amplified by rising food and fuel prices, is likely to fuel social unrest if the perception persists that the government is siphoning resources into elite protection while neglecting basic services. Twelfth, the parliamentary debate that is forthcoming must therefore address not only the immediacy of the financial drain but also the systemic reforms required to rebuild trust in public institutions. Thirteenth, a viable pathway forward involves establishing an independent oversight body with the authority to audit, evaluate, and recommend the consolidation of security functions under SAPS, thereby eliminating redundancy. Fourteenth, incentivizing community policing initiatives and investing in technology‑driven crime prevention can further reduce the reliance on costly private guards. Finally, the overarching lesson is clear: without decisive, transparent, and equitable reforms, South Africa will continue to pay twice for the same security, draining resources that could otherwise uplift its citizens.

  • Urmil Pathak
    Urmil Pathak August 15, 2025

    It’s striking how the private‑security spend mirrors the gaps left by the public police, highlighting a clear need for systemic reform.

Write a comment
Thanks for your comment
Error, comment failed